Anat Admati is the George G.C. Parker Professor of Finance and Economics at
Stanford’s Graduate School of Business.
Are banks
different? Why are financial institutions so highly indebted, while there are no
other highly leveraged companies in the economy?
Banks are different because they have easy access
to deposit funds and from that point on they prefer to have as little equity as
possible while taking risks. They are immediately in debt overhang. Add
government guarantees and subsidies of debt and the desire to always fund with
debt is fed and encouraged. For other companies, creditors worry about the
various inefficiencies and costs associated with high indebtedness. We explain
this in the book, chapters 3 and 9 in particular.
Why is it
the best fix for big banks to use more equity to fund their assets and
investments?
This fix involves essentially
"reshuffling" of financial claims to correct distortions and put in
place more liability and responsibility onto the balance sheet, alleviating the
great inefficiency and harm of high indebtedness. It is easier and more
effective, definitely also more cost effective, than trying to control the
details of what banks do or any solutions that just go and split or shrink the
balance sheet without addressing the fragility of the institutions and the
system. As long as the system remains interconnected and fragile, and can harm
when it gets distressed, the problems remain.
In addition, high indebtedness distorts lending
decisions of banks. They do not make business loans that have limited upside
even when they are good investments, because the residual equity does not have
enough upside and the investments benefit creditors or others at the expense of
shareholders. This is a classic debt overhang underinvestment problem. At the
same time, risky, even inefficient investments look attractive to
owners/managers, because they can benefit at the expense of creditors (or
whoever guarantees the debt).
How is it
possible to achieve more financial reform without sacrificing anything?
Build up the equity cushions and banks can do
everything at appropriate economic costs. It does not interfere with taking
deposits or providing liquidity and certainly not with lending.
Thank you
very much.
Anat Admati is the George G.C. Parker Professor of Finance and Economics at
Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. She serves on the FDIC Systemic
Resolution Advisory Committee and has contributed to the Financial Times,
Bloomberg News and the New York Times.
Along with
the interview the must-read book:
Anat Admati
& Martin Hellwig: The Bankers’ New Clothes: What’s wrong with Banking and What to Do about it. Princeton Press, 2013.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen